×
Home Service Pricing Affiliate Program Help Center About Us Login
National DPI Control Β· Latest 2026 Blocking Landscape

Russia's TSPU to 2030: Core DPI Principles, Tested Vulnerabilities, Major YouTube & Banking Incidents

Massive banking collateral in 2025, YouTube DNS removal in May 2026, nationwide VPN paralysis in June β€” deep dive into TSPU's three-tier architecture, four generations of AI detection, four Habr-tested vulnerabilities, and anti-censorship evolution.

In June 2025, mobile banking apps of multiple Russian banks suddenly went offline, ATMs stopped working; in March 2025, Moscow experienced two weeks of severe mobile network restrictions, and many blocked foreign platforms briefly became accessible again; from late May to early June 2026, YouTube, Telegram, and Discord suffered severe connection problems nationwide. The force behind these events is the Russian national DPI control system β€” TSPU.

I. TSPU Full Lifecycle: Legislation β†’ Pilot β†’ 2026 Full Deployment + Massive 2030 Expansion

1.1 Legal Origin: 2019 90-FZ Sovereign Internet Law and Early Pilot (2019–2024)

TSPU (ВСхничСскиС срСдства противодСйствия ΡƒΠ³Ρ€ΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΌ, Technical Means of Countering Threats) is legally rooted in Federal Law No. 90-FZ (Sovereign Internet Law) signed by Putin on May 1, 2019. The law took effect in November 2019, granting the Russian communications regulator (RKN, Roskomnadzor) centralized control over domestic internet traffic, including real-time website blocking and traffic filtering.

From 2020 to 2022, RKN launched TSPU pilot deployments in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other major cities, with the three largest operators (MTS, MegaFon, Rostelekom) assisting installation. In 2023, the project fully switched to domestic hardware, replacing foreign components with servers from Signaltek and Yadro. By the end of 2024, TSPU covered about 80% of Russian internet traffic, with over 2.5 million filtering rules.

1.2 Two Major 2025 Events: System Overload & Large-Scale Banking Collateral

Event 1: System overload triggered Bypass – nationwide unblock (March 22–23, 2025)
TSPU had to handle about 40,000 new filtering rules in a short period (normal updates are only 10,000–15,000). Insufficient computing power automatically activated Bypass mode β€” traffic went around DPI and was directly forwarded, causing many blocked foreign platforms to briefly become accessible again. TSPU devices have clear bandwidth limitations; when traffic exceeds processing capacity, the device automatically enters bypass mode and traffic reaches its destination directly. RKN's system cannot fully block prohibited websites at every moment; capacity limits create "leaks."

Event 2: Large-scale banking "friendly fire" (June 30, 2025)
While testing new VPN blocking rules, RKN's TSPU DPI misidentified TLS encrypted communications of Sberbank, Tinkoff, Alfa-Bank and others as VPN traffic, causing banking apps, payment systems, and ATMs to go offline for hours. TSPU's filtering heuristic was too crude β€” "I see TLS 1.3 and active packet hammering β†’ DROP" β€” exposing its fundamental technical difficulty in distinguishing legitimate financial traffic from VPN tunnels.

1.3 Key Milestone: YouTube DNS Block (February 2026)

In February 2026, after more than a year of throttling YouTube, RKN went further and removed the youtube.com domain from the national DNS system, making YouTube inaccessible through normal means inside Russia. Experts noted that this decision was related to Telegram slowdowns; TSPU systems installed on operator networks could not handle pressure from two major platforms simultaneously, so RKN chose to simply "turn off" YouTube via DNS.

1.4 Late May 2026: Large-scale VPN Failure

From late May to early June 2026, Russia experienced a nationwide large-scale VPN failure. Users reported VPN connections disconnecting within one or two minutes, latency spiking, and speeds dropping to minimum. Telegram, YouTube and Discord were all affected. RKN was reported to have discovered new vulnerabilities in MTProto proxies while also strengthening Chrome fingerprinting and TCP-RAW protocol blocking. The agency stated that companies could apply for access to foreign services through VPNs on a technical basis; more than 57,000 addresses and 1,700 organizations (including software developers) had been added to exception lists.

1.5 May 25, 2026 – TSPU Nationwide Full Deployment

May 25, 2026, TSPU achieved nationwide full deployment β€” all 85 federal subjects completed hardware upgrades to regional control centers, the three major carriers' backbone nodes reached 100% TSPU inline deployment, and nearly 100% of Russia's fixed and mobile internet traffic now passes through TSPU.

1.6 83.7 Billion Rubles Budget and 954 Tbit/s Bandwidth Expansion (Core 2030 TSPU Expansion Data)

πŸ“Š 2030 TSPU Expansion Budget and Bandwidth Indicators
Budget ItemAmount / Indicator
Original federal project budget68.8 billion RUB
2026 additional allocation14.9 billion RUB
2030 total budget83.7 billion RUB
National project"Data Economy and Digital Transformation of the State" β€” "Cybersecurity Infrastructure"
⚑ TSPU Bandwidth Expansion Comparison (2030 target 954 Tbit/s)
Bandwidth IndicatorOriginal Plan2030 TargetIncrease
Peak processing bandwidth752.6 Tbit/s954 Tbit/s+26.7%
Total system capacityBase capacity2.5Γ— current plan~150%
Russia's average daily traffic (2024)approx. 30 Tbit/s

954 Tbit/s is more than 30 times current actual traffic, providing strategic redundancy not only for traffic growth but also for expanding block lists and countering new evasion techniques. Power limitations sometimes cause bypass mode; the upgrade aims to match infrastructure to actual load while improving the effectiveness of blocking VPN evasion tools.

Since January 2026, operator compliance fines have taken effect: up to 1 million RUB for first-time legal entity violations, and up to 5 million RUB for repeat violations.

1.7 Three Major Operators and Court Fines

MTS: community feedback suggests it is the most aggressive in TSPU testing with the most noticeable blocking; MegaFon: completed backbone TSPU deployment; Rostelekom: state telecom giant handling much of the infrastructure upgrade and supplying domestic DPI equipment. Hardware suppliers include Signaltek, Yadro (servers), Eltex (switches), Silicom (bypass NICs), etc.

RKN also strengthened compliance oversight. In December 2025, RKN detected several operators that failed to correctly route traffic through TSPU, making YouTube accessible. The court accordingly fined five operators (Trivon Networks, YuL-Kom Media, iHome, AVK-Wellcom, Grand) 250,000 RUB each, fined MSK-IX and Tinko 250,000 RUB each, and fined Avantel 500,000 RUB.

II. Three-Tier Hardware Architecture: From Moscow Central Control to Operator Black Box

TSPU adopts a centralized, layered architecture with three levels from the highest decision-making layer to the actual execution layer closest to users.

Level 1: Central Management Center (TsMU SSOP)
Located in Moscow, subordinate to the Radio Frequency Center (GRChTs) under RKN, it is the "brain" of the system β€” formulates global filtering policies; manages four blacklists (IP, SNI, TLS fingerprint, protocol signature); uses AI to automatically cluster abnormal traffic and generate signature databases; distributes rules and receives and analyzes logs from across the country.

Level 2: 85 Federal Subjects Regional Control Centers (LTsU)
Deployed in each state, territory, republic; act as relays receiving central policies, forwarding them to local TSPU, and collecting traffic logs to send back to the central center.

Level 3: TSPU Hardware at BRAS/CGNAT
Physically deployed at operator BRAS (Broadband Remote Access Server) and CGNAT nodes, inline mode β€” all user traffic must be processed; actions include allow, drop, send TCP RST to terminate connections, rate-limit, HTTP redirect. When overloaded, Bypass mode may be triggered (scheduled to be phased out by 2030). Operators cannot view or modify configurations; devices are remotely controlled by RKN β€” a true "black box".

III. DPI Core Working Principle: How Encrypted TLS Traffic Is Identified Without Decryption

DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) is TSPU's core technology. Officially used for DDoS protection, in practice it accomplishes website blocking, traffic filtering, and suppression of circumvention tools like VPNs.

At L3/L4, DPI can see source/destination IPs and ports, TCP flags, packet sizes and frequencies β€” enabling IP blocking, rate-limiting, and detecting certain VPN/tunnels through patterns.

At L7, for HTTPS/TLS traffic, DPI cannot decrypt but can extract key information from the plaintext handshake: SNI (Server Name Indication) β€” the domain name transmitted in plaintext in ClientHello, the main basis for blocking websites; JA3/JA4 fingerprints β€” TLS client handshake parameter sets that can distinguish real browsers from VPN clients; DNS queries β€” if DNS is not encrypted (UDP 53), the QNAME is directly visible and can be blocked at the resolution stage.

When direct signatures are insufficient, DPI analyzes behavioral features β€” first packet sizes, send intervals, traffic direction, retransmission patterns β€” enough to distinguish HTTPS-masqueraded VPN traffic from normal web browsing.

⚠️ Misconception correction: DPI does not decrypt TLS content. True decryption would require a man-in-the-middle attack β€” replacing the server certificate β€” but modern browsers and apps strictly validate certificate chains and would error immediately upon detection of replacement. Therefore DPI can only "go around" encryption, obtaining information from the handshake or metadata. This is why SNI, JA3, and behavioral analysis are so crucial for TSPU.

IV. Four Generations of Technology Evolution: From IP Blacklists to AI Behavioral Recognition (2019–2030)

GenerationTimeTechnical FeatureCountermeasure
1st2019-2021IP/port blockingChange IP easily bypasses
2nd2021-2023SNI domain blockingSNI obfuscation (Reality)
3rd2023-2025Protocol fingerprint detection (MTProto/VLESS/WireGuard)Self-hosted node lifespan drops sharply
4th2026 onward2.27 billion RUB for AI behavioral analysisDetects "multi-device shared-IP proxies", dynamically adapts to new circumvention techniques

In January 2026, RKN announced the development of a machine-learning-based traffic filtering system to be integrated into the TSPU infrastructure, marking a shift from static signature matching to dynamic behavioral recognition.

V. Deployment Outcomes, Side Effects, and Real-World Collateral Cases

5.1 Actual Blocking Effectiveness Against Self-Hosted Proxies

As of June 2026, after full TSPU deployment, self-hosted proxy survival rates have plummeted. Port 443 VLESS+Reality configurations are instantly dropped or throttled to zero; self-hosted VPS lifespans shorten to days; same-IP shared proxies are accurately targeted by AI clustering; Shadowsocks-2022 (on high ports) and xHTTP direct mode still work; chained proxies (Russian VPS β†’ foreign VPS, TSPU sees a Russian IP and usually leaves it alone) still work.

Community testing also found that high-port rules are much looser than port 443 β€” moving the same proxy configuration to port 47000+ allows up to 80% of packets through, as TSPU prioritizes deep inspection of standard HTTPS ports to save hardware resources, performing only shallow checks on high ports. Empty SNI settings lift blocks in 100% of test cases because TSPU's blocking strategy relies on SNI blacklist matching.

5.2 Collateral Damage: Banks, Local Sites, and IT Industry

June 30, 2025 banking outage: multiple bank apps and ATMs offline for hours.

"Whitelist" irony: some mobile operators enabled IP whitelists, but many Russian banks and government services were not on those whitelists, while Cloudflare IP ranges were β€” forcing users to turn on VPNs just to access domestic banking or Gosuslugi websites.

Local hosting provider throttling: when a browser made many connections to ordinary web pages on Russian hosting provider Selectel, TSPU triggered rate-limiting or drops due to "TLS 1.3 + active packet hammering".

YouTube and multi-platform widespread outage (early June 2026): late May to early June 2026, VPNs failed on a large scale across Russia. RKN was reported to have found new MTProto proxy vulnerabilities and simultaneously strengthened Chrome fingerprinting and TCP-RAW protocol blocking. Telegram, YouTube, and Discord were hit hard, even under functioning VPNs. Experts said TSPU upgrades directly impact VPN stability. Network latency surged, some VPN connections stayed alive for only one or two minutes, and data rates dropped to minimums.

IT industry collateral damage: Russian IT companies rely on overseas resources for software development; the VPN crackdown prevented them from accessing necessary tools.

5.3 Operator Fines and Legal Pressure

RKN systematically checks through the GRChTs monitoring center whether each operator's traffic passes through TSPU filtering. If a blocked website has no TSPU interception log and is still accessible, inspectors issue a violation report. In December 2025, RKN detected several operators that failed to route traffic correctly through TSPU, making YouTube accessible. The court fined Trivon Networks, YuL-Kom Media, iHome, AVK-Wellcom, and Grand 250,000 RUB each; fined MSK-IX and Tinko 250,000 RUB each; and fined Avantel 500,000 RUB. This penalty system puts economic pressure on operators to comply.

5.4 Expansion of the National Anti-DDoS System

RKN's GRChTs announced expansion of the National Anti-DDoS System (NSPA), which currently uses 88 cross-border TSPU devices to successfully repel external attacks. Experts recommend adding a new line of defense between backbone carriers and large enterprises to analyze and block internal malicious traffic. Cybersecurity experts emphasize that TSPU efficiency depends not only on bandwidth but also on network architecture, node distribution, and traffic management quality.

VI. Four Exploitable Vulnerabilities Measured by Habr and Tech Communities

πŸ”“ High-port spot-check vulnerability
The same VLESS+Reality configuration is instantly blocked on port 443, but when moved to a high port like 47000+, up to 80% of packets get through. TSPU prioritizes deep inspection of standard HTTPS ports to save hardware resources, only doing shallow checks on high ports.
πŸ”“ Empty SNI bypass principle
Setting the SNI field in TLS ClientHello to empty lifts the block in 100% of test cases. TSPU's blocking strategy relies on SNI blacklist matching; an empty SNI cannot match any rule and is therefore allowed through. Also, removing the fingerprint (setting to empty) helps.
πŸ”“ TCP fragmentation & Bypass fallback
Splitting the TLS ClientHello into multiple TCP segments can evade some DPI systems that lack the resources to reassemble packets (modern TSPU can reassemble, so this method is losing effectiveness). Also, when TSPU devices are overloaded they automatically trigger bypass mode, letting traffic go uninspected. The 2030 plan explicitly mentions phasing out the automatic bypass redundancy mechanism.
πŸ”“ "Memory corruption" hypothesis
Packet captures show that in some blocked connections, the first few bytes of TLS ClientHello are modified rather than simply dropped. This explains why strict VPN protocols (like VLESS) immediately disconnect (seeing modification as active probing), while normal browsers with retransmission mechanisms may still work.

In addition, QUIC (HTTP/3) traffic is effectively blocked; UDP port 443 is effectively blocked, forcing all connections to fall back to slower HTTPS (TCP 443), though circumvention tools continue to evolve using traffic modification techniques.

VII. Conclusion: The Long-Term Arms Race Between TSPU and Encryption Technologies

TSPU has gone from a 2019 law to covering 100% of Russian traffic by May 25, 2026, with a budget increased to 83.7 billion rubles and processing capacity planned to reach 954 Tbit/s by 2030 β€” more than 30 times current actual traffic. Its DPI technology has evolved through four generations from IP blacklists to AI behavioral analysis.

At the same time, communities like Habr keep discovering exploitable vulnerabilities β€” high ports, empty SNI, Bypass overload fallback. This is an endless arms race: protocol designers pursue stronger privacy (ECH, QUIC, traffic obfuscation), while TSPU keeps evolving with AI and new signatures.

For ordinary users, a clear signal is: the era of a single protocol, a one-click script, and "set and forget" is over. For the TSPU system itself, perhaps the biggest challenge is not technical, but how to achieve regulatory goals without damaging the country's own financial and communications infrastructure β€” the June 2025 banking incident and the June 2026 massive VPN failure have already sounded the alarm.

FAQ

Q1: Why is VLESS on port 443 likely blocked, but high ports work?
TSPU prioritizes full depth-inspection on standard HTTPS port (443) to save computing power, while high ports get only shallow checks or no checks at all. Moving the proxy to a random high port like 47000+ can temporarily bypass, but this vulnerability may be fixed in the future.
Q2: Is TSPU a black box? Can operators modify rules?
No. TSPU devices are directly developed and remotely controlled by RKN; operators only provide space and power and have no right to view, configure, or modify any filtering rules. Violations could lead to heavy fines or even license revocation.
Q3: Can QUIC/DoH encrypted DNS bypass TSPU?
Partial bypass, but not complete. QUIC (UDP 443) encrypts most headers, but TSPU can still block via UDP port, Initial packet signatures, known CIDs, etc. DoH/DoT hide DNS queries, but SNI remains visible (unless ECH is enabled), and DPI can still identify via behavioral analysis.
Q4: What does cancelling Bypass by 2030 mean?
Currently when TSPU is overloaded it automatically falls back to Bypass, allowing traffic to go uninspected. The 2030 plan explicitly aims to phase out this mechanism, at which point the system will forcibly process all traffic, no longer leaking due to overload β€” greatly improving blocking reliability but also potentially increasing collateral damage.
This article is based on the Russian Ministry of Digital Development's official work plan, RKN public documents, reports from Kommersant/TAdviser, technical discussions on Habr.com and GitHub. It aims to provide objective technical information. The bypass methods described are for understanding the technical principles only and do not constitute usage recommendations.
🎯 Free 3-Day Trial (Anti-TSPU Line) πŸ“’ Official Telegram Channel